Example Technology Performance
Assessment Task
|
Task #5 |
A Report Containing Text and Visual Representation |
|
Grade |
6 |
|
Content Area(s) |
Science |
|
Unit Title/Theme |
Testing Soil for Growth Potential |
|
Task Developer/Author |
René Herrick |
1.
Setting the Context
Within any study connected with our environment (Vermont history,
environmental impact) students will investigate soil samples (with a digital tool)
and document findings on a spread sheet and write a lab report, beginning with
a hypothesis, stating what type of soil or combination of soils would be best
suited to grow corn.
2. Grade Expectations/Standards
This task can be incorporated in investigative science units that are part of
Standard 7.19 –Designing Solutions – Students use technological/engineering processes to design solutions to problems.
Fields of Knowledge: Science, Mathematics, Technology
· Standard 7.1 Scientific Method – Students use scientific method to explain, describe and investigate phenomena.
· Standard 7.2 Investigation – Students conduct a variety of their own investigations and projects.
Technology
IT1 - Basic Operations & Concepts
IT3
- Productivity Tools
·
Creating
a graphical representation of multiple series of numerical data.
Content
7.1 Scientific method – Students use scientific method to explain, describe and investigate phenomena.
7.2 Investigation – Students conduct a variety of their own investigations and projects
3. The Performance Task
Task
Statement:
Students will write a
report using a word processing program including visual representations using
basic computer operations. Students will
create a hypotheses based on a question regarding soil content and best soil
for growing corn. Data will be gathered
using a ProScopetm (digital microscope tool) and entered into a
spreadsheet.
Teacher will gather soil
samples from 3 different sites within the community (one site being ideal soil
for growing corn). Students will analyze soil with digital microscope (ProScopetm). The lesson plan for this activity can be
found at this site, www.theproscope.com.
Click on Education link “putting the fun
back in learning.” Then click the link
to http://www.theproscope.com/pdf/Analyzing_Soil.pdf
Students will begin
their lab report by making a hypothesis stating what type of soil or
combination of soils would be best suited to grow corn.
A standard lab report is
written discussing the hypotheses and rationale. Visual representations will be a part of the
lab report. These visuals would be gathered from digital photos taken during
lab time or from microscopic view.
Data of the findings are
entered into a spreadsheet under the headings of different types of soil. Data is represented beneath the location on
the spreadsheet. Soil samples will then be put in a graph form. The graphs will be copied and pasted into the
written report.
Graphs will be made
using findings and will be inserted into the report, highlighting the best soil
combination for growing corn. (other crops could be substituted)
Goal:
To investigate, through use of technology (digital
tool), soil samples from the local area and document these findings on a
spreadsheet. Students will then write a
report beginning with the original hypothesis stating which soil sample would
best be used to grow corn.
Role: The student will be in the role of researcher.
Audience: Fellow students as well as local farmers and possible local newspaper.
Situation: Students will research 3 different soil samples using a digital tool (microscope) and analyze the data found by documenting findings on a spreadsheet.
Product/Performance: A typed lab report that incorporates text, visual representations, spreadsheets and graphs.
4.
Activities
Teacher information
Soil is, on average, 45% mineral particles, 25% water, 25% air, and 5% organic matter. Five to ten tons of animal life can live in an acre of topsoil. Soil also contains earthworms that are natural recyclers. They digest soil, break down organic matter, and release nutrients. One earthworm can digest 36 tons of soil in a year.
Other information on soil, soil profiles, soil composition,
soil testing, and plant growth is available on the Internet, including the
Eco-Connections website (www.ecoconnections.org).
This free, Internet-based environmental project includes modules written by
teachers from the
In their findings, students should determine that the ProScope USB microscope enabled them to better analyze the soil samples as well as to document their scientific research. If desired, you can facilitate a discussion about the role of technology, including computers and microscopes, in scientific research.
Students take digital pictures of the samples and the activities to insert into their report.
Data on spreadsheet is put into a graph using the graph wizard provided.
Review report writing criteria for grade level and rubric for reports.
Students independently write standard lab report, inserting visual representations and graphs gathered from data collected.
5.
Materials and Resources
Materials needed include:
computers that have USB available for attaching
digital camera and pro scope
digital camera
Pro Scope digital microscope (or the like)
soil collected from 3 sites within your
community (one being from a corn field)
word processing program that students are
familiar using
spreadsheet program that students are familiar
using
lab area within the school or classroom for
doing digital microscopic investigation
teacher to acquire soil recommendations from
locate university or agriculture group for growing corn
6.
Criteria/Rubric
Technology
Rubric
|
Grade Expectation |
Introduced |
With Assistance |
Met the Standard |
|
Basic Operations |
|||
|
Navigating
between open windows and applications. |
|
|
|
|
Using
digital tools to capture images and other information (e.g.
temperature, light, sound, etc.) and import them into a computer. |
|
|
|
|
Social, Ethical & Human Issues |
|||
|
Not
Assessed |
|
|
|
|
Productivity Tools |
|||
|
Manipulating
styles and formats (e.g. header, footer, borders, page breaks, lists). |
|
|
|
|
Using spell check, and thesaurus. |
|
|
|
|
Creating
a table |
|
|
|
|
Creating
a spreadsheet from a blank page, including simple formulas and simple
functions (SUM and AVG ). |
|
|
|
|
Creating a
graphical representation of multiple series of numerical data. |
|
|
|
|
Manipulating format (e.g., resizing rows and
columns, font, colors, hiding grid) |
|
|
|
|
Communication |
|||
|
Not
Assessed |
|
|
|
|
Research, Problem Solving & Decision Making |
|||
|
Not
Assessed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.
Checklist |
|
|
|
Rubric for Lab Report
|
CATEGORY |
4 Exceeds Expectations |
3 Meets Expectations |
2 Almost Meets |
1 Does Not Meet |
|
Experimental Hypothesis |
Hypothesized
relationship between the variables and the predicted results is clear and
reasonable based on what has been studied. |
Hypothesized
relationship between the variables and the predicted results is reasonable
based on general knowledge and observations. |
Hypothesized
relationship between the variables and the predicted results has been stated,
but appears to be based on flawed logic. |
No
hypothesis has been stated. |
|
Procedures |
Procedures
are listed in clear steps. Each step is numbered and is a complete sentence. |
Procedures
are listed in a logical order, but steps are not numbered and/or are not in
complete sentences. |
Procedures
are listed but are not in a logical order or are difficult to follow. |
Procedures
do not accurately list the steps of the experiment. |
|
Data |
Professional
looking and accurate representation of the data in tables and/or graphs.
Graphs and tables are labeled and titled. |
Accurate
representation of the data in tables and/or graphs. Graphs and tables are
labeled and titled. |
Accurate
representation of the data in written form, but no graphs or tables are
presented. |
Data
are not shown OR are inaccurate. |
|
Materials |
All
materials and setup used in the experiment are clearly and accurately
described. |
Almost
all materials and the setupu used in the experiment are clearly and
accurately described. |
Most
of the materials and the setup used in the experiment are accurately described.
|
Many
materials are described inaccurately OR are not described at all. |
|
Drawings/Diagrams |
Clear,
accurate diagrams are included and make the experiment easier to understand.
Diagrams are labeled neatly and accurately. |
Diagrams
are included and are labeled neatly and accurately. |
Diagrams
are included and are labeled. |
Needed
diagrams are missing OR are missing important labels. |
|
Analysis |
The
relationship between the variables is discussed and trends/patterns logically
analyzed. Predictions are made about what might happen if part of the lab
were changed or how the experimental design could be changed. |
The
relationship between the variables is discussed and trends/patterns logically
analyzed. |
The
relationship between the variables is discussed but no patterns, trends or
predictions are made based on the data. |
The
relationship between the variables is not discussed. |
|
Conclusion |
Conclusion
includes whether the findings supported the hypothesis, possible sources of
error, and what was learned from the experiment. |
Conclusion
includes whether the findings supported the hypothesis and what was learned
from the experiment. |
Conclusion
includes what was learned from the experiment. |
No
conclusion was included in the report OR shows little effort and reflection. |
|
Components of the report |
All
required elements are present and additional elements that add to the report
(e.g., thoughtful comments, graphics) have been added. |
All
required elements are present. |
One
required element is missing, but additional elements that add to the report
(e.g., thoughtful comments, graphics) have been added. |
Several
required elements are missing. |
|
Spelling, Punctuation and Grammar |
One
or fewer errors in spelling, punctuation and grammar in the report. |
Two
or three errors in spelling, punctuation and grammar in the report. |
Four
errors in spelling, punctuation and grammar in the report. |
More
than 4 errors in spelling, punctuation and grammar in the report. |
o Student completed soil lab investigation
o Student entered data on spreadsheet listed under categories selected in advance
o Student created graphs from data collected
o
Student completed lab report and included visual
representations such as digital pictures and graphs from data collected